Can AI Be Your Writing Coach? Five Examples from the Political Right

Large language models have significantly improved their ability to analyze written content and provide meaningful insights. While there's been considerable criticism about AI-generated writing, these models might actually serve as valuable tools for writers looking to improve their craft.

In a recent experiment meant to help me improve my own writing, I asked ChatGPT to analyze writing samples from five political authors. In my opinion, the results revealed some of the depth and nuance these models can bring to writing analysis.

AI Analysis

The AI demonstrated a better-than-expected ability to dissect writing across multiple dimensions, from basic grammar and syntax to sophisticated elements like tone, coherence, and stylistic devices.

For instance, in analyzing George F. Will's Washington Post article, the AI identified his sophisticated use of varied sentence structures, precise vocabulary choices, and effective employment of rhetorical devices —all hallmarks of high-quality political commentary.

Comparative Insights

What's particularly striking is how the AI identified distinct writing styles and their effectiveness. Consider the contrast between Will's "sophisticated yet precise" vocabulary and David Storm's more "informal and colloquial" approach for Hot Air.

The AI noted how these different styles served their respective audiences and purposes while also pointing out areas for improvement, such as Storm's grammatical errors and repetitive phrases.

Technical Precision

The analysis showed strength in identifying technical elements of writing.

• Grammar and syntax. The AI carefully noted strengths and weaknesses, from Will's "impeccable grammar" to Storm's occasional subject-verb agreement issues.
• Structure and organization. Each analysis began with a thorough examination of how the writer organized their thoughts and arguments.
• Vocabulary and diction. The AI consistently evaluated word choice, noting when writers avoided unnecessarily complex terms like "utilize" in favor of better alternatives like "use." This is important because using words like "utilize" and "strategize" is a leading indicator of poor writing.

Beyond the Basics

The AI analysis is even more valuable because it moves beyond mechanical elements to assess more nuanced aspects of writing.

• Tone and voice. The AI identified distinct authorial voices, from Simon Ateba's "informative and objective" tone to Douglas Wilson's "critical and confrontational" style.
• Stylistic devices. The analysis captured sophisticated elements like metaphors, allusions, and rhetorical questions, showing how different writers employed these tools for effect.
• Audience awareness. The AI consistently evaluated how well each piece matched its intended audience's needs and reading level.

Learning Opportunities

The AI's analysis offers several advantages for writers looking to improve their craft.

• Objective feedback. The AI provides dispassionate analysis of writing strengths and weaknesses, without the personal biases that might color human feedback.
• Comprehensive review. The systematic approach ensures that almost no aspect of writing is overlooked, from basic grammar to sophisticated stylistic elements.
• Comparative learning. By analyzing multiple writers, the AI helps identify different approaches to effective writing across various styles and contexts.

Practical Applications

Content creators can use AI analysis to identify patterns in their writing that might need attention; understand how their own writing compares to established writers in their field; learn specific techniques for improving organization, clarity, and engagement; and adapt their style for different audiences while maintaining quality.

The Future of Writing Improvement

While AI-generated content may have its critics, the technology's ability to analyze writing offers a promising tool for improvement. The detailed, multi-faceted analysis demonstrated in these political writing samples shows how AI can serve as a valuable writing coach, helping authors understand their strengths and weaknesses while providing specific paths to improvement.

As language models continue to develop, their ability to provide nuanced writing analysis will likely improve further. This expected improvement suggests that rather than viewing AI as a threat to good writing, we might better understand it as a powerful tool for developing and refining writing skills. The future of writing improvement might well lie in this partnership between human creativity and AI analysis.

Raw Writing Analysis

What follows is the actual writing analysis I used in my AI writing coach experiment. I intend to continue experimenting with AI as a writing coach, so I encourage you to subscribe to the You, Money, Happiness newsletter to stay connected.

George F. Will

Will was writing in "The Washington Post" on November 13, 2024. The opinion piece was titled, "The world's richest person is about to receive a free public education."

1. Structure and Organization

The article begins with a provocative headline and an introductory paragraph that sets the tone by juxtaposing Donald Trump's past defeat with his current victory. The piece is structured logically, progressing from Trump's administrative choices to Elon Musk's proposed government spending cuts. It then delves into historical parallels with Ronald Reagan's administration and the challenges of cutting federal spending. The author ties in past and present by illustrating recurring political themes, concluding with reflections on demographic shifts and historical electoral outcomes.

2. Grammar, Syntax, and Sentence Structure

The writing showcases impeccable grammar and varied sentence structures, ranging from complex, multi-clause sentences to succinct statements for emphasis (e.g., "Well."). The author effectively uses parenthetical remarks and asides to provide additional context without disrupting the flow. Rhetorical questions and parallel structures enhance readability and engage the reader.

George F. Will Sentence Example

Selected Sentence:

"His favorite word is ('freedom'? 'justice'? don't be silly) 'tariff,' and the point of tariffs is to increase prices of domestically produced goods by depressing competition from foreign goods."

Sentence Diagram Explanation:

• Main Clause 1: "His favorite word is 'tariff,'"

  • Subject: "His favorite word"

  • Linking Verb: "is"

  • Predicate Nominative: "'tariff,'"

  • Parenthetical Asides: ("'freedom'? 'justice'? don't be silly)

    • These asides interrupt the main clause, providing sarcastic alternatives to "tariff."
    • 'freedom'? (Interrogative aside suggesting an alternative word)
    • 'justice'? (Another interrogative aside)
    • don't be silly (An imperative aside dismissing the previous suggestions)

• Conjunction: "and"

• Main Clause 2: "the point of tariffs is to increase prices of domestically produced goods by depressing competition from foreign goods."

  • Subject: "the point of tariffs"
  • Linking Verb: "is"
  • Predicate Nominative: "to increase prices of domestically produced goods"
    • Infinitive Phrase: "to increase prices"
      • Direct Object: "prices"
      • Prepositional Phrase: "of domestically produced goods"
  • Adverbial Phrase: "by depressing competition from foreign goods"
    • Gerund Phrase: "depressing competition"
      • Direct Object: "competition"
      • Prepositional Phrase: "from foreign goods"

How It Supports the Analysis:

This sentence showcases George F. Will's use of complex sentence structures and parenthetical remarks. The insertion of sarcastic asides ("'freedom'? 'justice'? don't be silly") demonstrates his sophisticated use of language to convey tone and engage the reader. The diagram illustrates how these asides are embedded within the main clause without disrupting the grammatical integrity of the sentence, supporting the point that his writing features impeccable grammar and varied sentence structures.

3. Vocabulary and Diction

The vocabulary is sophisticated yet precise, reflecting an erudite tone without unnecessary complexity. Words like "deviationism," "excommunicated," and "obdurate" are used appropriately, enhancing the text's intellectual appeal. The author avoids inflated language and does not resort to words like "utilize" or "strategize," favoring direct and clear expression.

4. Tone and Voice

The tone is critical and sardonic, infused with dry humor and irony. The author's voice is authoritative and confident, presenting opinions with conviction. The use of wit and subtle sarcasm underscores the critique of political figures and policies.

5. Stylistic Devices

The article employs a range of stylistic devices:

• Metaphors and Analogies: Comparing political events to recurring life patterns.
• Allusions: References to "Catch-22," Kris Kristofferson's lyrics, and historical political figures like Barry Goldwater.
• Rhetorical Questions: Engaging readers to consider underlying assumptions.
• Parenthetical Statements: Providing additional insights and emphasizing points.

6. Point of View

Written in the third person, the article presents the author's perspectives while maintaining an analytical stance. The use of third-person narrative allows for a broader commentary on political events.

7. Cohesion and Coherence

The piece is cohesive, with each paragraph logically following the previous one. Transitional phrases and thematic consistency tie together discussions of current events, historical parallels, and future projections, creating a unified argument.

8. Use of Evidence

The author supports assertions with specific data, such as budget percentages and historical electoral counts. Historical examples and quotes from literature bolster the credibility of the arguments and provide depth.

9. Estimated Reading Level

The reading level is advanced, likely suitable for college-educated readers. The complexity of ideas, vocabulary, and sentence structure requires a higher level of literacy and familiarity with political and historical references.

Summary of Grammar and Writing Analysis

George F. Will's article exemplifies high-caliber political commentary characterized by precise grammar and sophisticated syntax. The varied sentence structures maintain reader engagement, while the impeccable grammar ensures clarity. The diction is formal and exacting, avoiding unnecessary jargon or overused terms like "utilize" or "strategize," which aligns with the standards of effective writing.

Stylistically, the use of metaphors, historical allusions, and rhetorical devices enriches the narrative, providing depth and encouraging readers to draw connections between past and present political landscapes. The authoritative tone and well-supported arguments reflect a seasoned writer's command over the subject matter, resulting in a compelling and thought-provoking piece.

Overall, the article's advanced reading level and intellectual rigor make it a substantial contribution to political discourse, appealing to readers who appreciate nuanced analysis and eloquent expression.

David Storm

Strom wrote for the website "Hot Air" on November 13, 2024. The article was titled "The Democratic Party Civil War Will Be Gloriously Entertaining."

1. Structure and Organization

The article begins with a provocative headline and an engaging introduction that invites readers to witness internal conflict within the Democratic Party. The author sets the stage by discussing Congressman Seth Moulton's shift in stance on certain social issues, specifically those related to gender identity. The piece progresses by highlighting the backlash Moulton faces from his party and analyzing his motives. It then broadens to predict a looming ideological civil war within the Democratic Party, discussing potential factions and future implications. The conclusion encourages readers to enjoy the unfolding spectacle, effectively bookending the article with the initial invitation to watch the "cage match."

2. Grammar, Syntax, and Sentence Structure

The writing features a conversational tone with generally correct grammar and a mix of sentence structures. However, there are several grammatical errors and typos:

• Repetition: "Academics, nonprofit leaders, nonprofit leaders, and fellow politicians..." repeats "nonprofit leaders."
• Punctuation Errors: Missing spaces after periods and misplaced commas (e.g., "for his supposed cruelty,.").
• Subject-Verb Agreement: Inconsistent use that may confuse readers.
• Pronoun References: Ambiguous pronouns that could lead to misunderstanding.

The sentences vary in length and complexity, but the grammatical issues can disrupt the flow and clarity of the text.

David Storm's Sentence Example

Selected Sentence:

"Academics, nonprofit leaders, nonprofit leaders, and fellow politicians have attacked Moulton for asserting that boys are boys and girls are girls."

Sentence Diagram Explanation:

• Subject: "Academics, nonprofit leaders, nonprofit leaders, and fellow politicians"

  • List of Nouns (Subjects):
    • "Academics"
    • "nonprofit leaders"
    • "nonprofit leaders" (repetition indicating a grammatical error)
    • "fellow politicians"

• Verb Phrase: "have attacked"

  • Auxiliary Verb: "have"
  • Main Verb: "attacked"

• Direct Object: "Moulton"

• Prepositional Phrase: "for asserting that boys are boys and girls are girls"

  • Preposition: "for"
  • Gerund Phrase: "asserting that boys are boys and girls are girls"
    • Dependent Clause: "that boys are boys and girls are girls"
      • Parallel Structures:
        • "boys are boys"
        • "girls are girls"

How It Supports the Analysis:

This sentence highlights the grammatical errors noted in the analysis, specifically the repetition of "nonprofit leaders." The diagram underscores this error by showing the redundant listing in the subject. This supports the point that the article contains grammatical mistakes that can disrupt the flow and clarity of the text.

3. Vocabulary and Diction

The language is informal and colloquial, using vivid imagery and idiomatic expressions. Phrases like "beat the hell out of each other," "ravenously hungry to tear him limb from limb," and "pop your popcorn" contribute to an accessible but informal style. The author repeatedly uses the term "alphabet ideology," a derogatory reference to LGBTQ+ issues, which may be offensive to some readers. The diction is partisan and sometimes inflammatory, aiming to provoke and entertain rather than inform objectively.

4. Tone and Voice

The tone is mocking, sarcastic, and gleeful about the prospect of internal conflict within the Democratic Party. The author adopts a partisan voice, displaying clear bias against Democrats and progressives. The writing seeks to amuse like-minded readers by highlighting and exaggerating the perceived discord among political opponents.

5. Stylistic Devices

• Metaphors and Similes: Comparing the political situation to a "cage match" and Democrats to "wolves going after a wounded lamb."
• Imagery: Vivid descriptions meant to evoke strong visual impressions.
• Idioms and Colloquialisms: Use of everyday expressions enhances the informal tone.
• Repetition: Some phrases and terms are repeated for emphasis, though occasionally due to typos.

6. Point of View

The article is written primarily in the second person to engage readers directly ("If you like the idea..."), while also employing the third person when discussing political figures. This mix aims to create a connection with the reader and encourage them to share the author's perspective.

7. Cohesion and Coherence

The article maintains a general focus on the anticipated conflicts within the Democratic Party, but transitions between ideas can be abrupt. While the narrative follows a logical progression from Moulton's actions to broader party implications, the lack of smooth transitions and occasional disjointed thoughts may hinder overall coherence.

8. Use of Evidence

The author provides limited concrete evidence to support assertions. References to Seth Moulton's shift in position lack specific quotes or detailed examples. Generalizations about reactions from "academics, nonprofit leaders, and fellow politicians" are made without citations. The piece relies more on opinion and speculative predictions than on verifiable data or sources.

9. Estimated Reading Level

The estimated reading level is around grades 8–10. The straightforward language and simple sentence structures make the content accessible to a general audience.

Summary of Grammar and Writing Analysis

The article employs an informal and conversational style intended to entertain a partisan readership. While this approach can engage readers, the presence of grammatical errors, such as typos and punctuation mistakes, detracts from the professionalism of the piece. The varied sentence structures help maintain interest, but clarity is occasionally compromised by ambiguous pronoun usage and abrupt transitions.

The diction is deliberately colloquial and provocative, using vivid imagery and idiomatic expressions to emphasize points. However, the repeated use of derogatory terms like "alphabet ideology" introduces a biased and potentially offensive tone. The lack of substantial evidence or specific examples weakens the article's persuasive power, as arguments are not well-supported.

To enhance the writing, careful proofreading to eliminate grammatical errors is necessary. Providing concrete evidence and adopting a more balanced tone would improve credibility and broaden the article's appeal beyond a like-minded audience.

Simon Ateba

Ateba wrote for "Today News Africa" on November 7, 2024. His article was "Trump's Africa Agenda — Top 50 Challenges Facing the President-Elect's Return to the Global Stage."

1. Structure and Organization

The article begins with an introduction that sets the stage for the challenges facing President-elect Donald Trump's administration in Africa. It outlines the increasing importance of Africa on the global stage due to population growth and strategic interests. The body is organized into clear sections with subheadings that categorize the main challenges: Economic Hardships and Debt Distress, Energy and Infrastructure Deficits, Climate Change and Environmental Challenges, Security and Political Instability, Health Crises and Food Security, Rising Geopolitical Tensions, and Social Development Challenges. The article concludes with recommendations for Trump's approach to Africa, providing actionable strategies to address each challenge.

2. Grammar, Syntax, and Sentence Structure

The writing demonstrates proper grammar and syntax throughout. Sentences are well-constructed, varying in length to maintain reader engagement. The author effectively uses complex sentences to convey detailed information without sacrificing clarity. There are minimal grammatical errors, and punctuation is used correctly to enhance readability.

Simon Ateba's Example Sentence

Selected Sentence:

"With Africa’s population set to double by 2050 and the continent’s strategic importance growing amid increasing Chinese and Russian influence, Trump’s approach to Africa could redefine U.S. relations with the region."

Sentence Diagram Explanation:

• Introductory Prepositional Phrase: "With Africa’s population set to double by 2050 and the continent’s strategic importance growing amid increasing Chinese and Russian influence"

  • Compound Gerund Phrases:
    • "Africa’s population set to double by 2050"
      • Subject: "Africa’s population"
      • Verb Phrase: "set to double"
      • Prepositional Phrase: "by 2050"
    • Conjunction: "and"
    • "the continent’s strategic importance growing amid increasing Chinese and Russian influence"
      • Subject: "the continent’s strategic importance"
      • Verb Phrase: "growing"
      • Prepositional Phrase: "amid increasing Chinese and Russian influence"

• Main Clause: "Trump’s approach to Africa could redefine U.S. relations with the region."

  • Subject: "Trump’s approach to Africa"
  • Modal Verb: "could"
  • Main Verb: "redefine"
  • Direct Object: "U.S. relations with the region"

How It Supports the Analysis:

This complex sentence demonstrates the proper grammar and syntax highlighted in the analysis. The sentence effectively combines a lengthy introductory phrase with a clear main clause, showcasing the author's ability to manage complex ideas without sacrificing clarity. The diagram illustrates the sentence's structure, highlighting the use of multiple clauses and phrases that contribute to the article's sophisticated yet accessible style.

3. Vocabulary and Diction

The vocabulary is formal and appropriate for a policy analysis piece. The author employs precise terms relevant to international relations and development (e.g., "debt-to-GDP ratios," "climate adaptation," "geopolitical tensions"). The diction is professional without being overly technical, making the article accessible to readers with a general understanding of global affairs. The writer avoids unnecessary jargon and does not use words like "utilize" or "strategize," favoring clearer alternatives.

4. Tone and Voice

The tone is informative and objective, aiming to present an unbiased overview of the challenges and potential strategies. The author's voice is authoritative yet neutral, refraining from emotional language or personal opinions. This approach helps to establish credibility and trust with the reader.

5. Stylistic Devices

The article uses several stylistic devices:

• Headings and Subheadings: Organize content and guide the reader through different topics.
• Parallel Structure: Especially in the recommendations section, enhancing readability.
• Statistical Data: Incorporates figures to emphasize points (e.g., "Africa's population set to double by 2050").
• Formal Language: Maintains a professional tone appropriate for the subject matter.

6. Point of View

The article is written in the third person, suitable for an analytical and informative piece. This perspective allows the author to discuss the issues comprehensively without inserting personal bias.

7. Cohesion and Coherence

The piece is cohesive, with each section logically following from the previous one. Transitional phrases and consistent thematic focus ensure that the article flows smoothly. The progression from outlining challenges to providing recommendations enhances the overall coherence.

8. Use of Evidence

The author supports statements with relevant data and examples. References to specific countries and situations (e.g., debt issues in Zambia and Ghana, droughts in Kenya and Ethiopia) provide concrete evidence for the arguments made. However, the article does not include citations or sources for the data presented, which could strengthen its credibility.

9. Estimated Reading Level

The reading level is advanced, likely appropriate for college-educated individuals or professionals interested in international relations and policy analysis. The complexity of the vocabulary and sentence structures suggests a reading level at or above grade 12.

Summary of Grammar and Writing Analysis

The article is well-crafted, demonstrating strong command over grammar and sentence construction. The use of varied sentence lengths and structures keeps the reader engaged while effectively conveying complex information. The grammar is nearly flawless, with proper punctuation and syntax enhancing clarity.

The vocabulary is precise and suitable for the topic, avoiding unnecessary complexity or overused terms like "utilize" or "strategize." The diction contributes to a professional and authoritative tone, making the article accessible to readers with a background in the subject matter.

Stylistically, the use of headings and organized sections aids in navigating the content, while the inclusion of statistical data and specific examples strengthens the arguments presented. The neutral tone and third-person perspective maintain objectivity, which is essential for an informative piece of this nature.

Overall, the article effectively communicates the significant challenges and recommendations regarding U.S. relations with Africa under President-elect Donald Trump's administration, providing valuable insights for policymakers and interested readers.

Paul Mullen

Mullen wrote "The Heritage Foundation" on November 13, 2024. His article was titled "Inflation May Be Cooling, but the Damage Has Been Done."

1. Structure and Organization

The article begins with an engaging introduction that addresses common misconceptions about inflation "cooling" and immediately challenges this notion by highlighting the persistent high prices consumers face. It progresses logically, explaining why prices remain high despite reports of slowing inflation. The author uses analogies, such as comparing inflation to a burning house, to clarify complex economic concepts. The piece concludes by emphasizing the lasting damage of inflation and encourages readers to verify the impact using a personal inflation calculator.

2. Grammar, Syntax, and Sentence Structure

The writing is generally clear and grammatically correct, using a mix of sentence lengths and structures to maintain reader interest. The author employs rhetorical questions and direct address ("you") to engage readers. There are instances of sentences beginning with conjunctions ("Yes, but when the Federal Reserve tells us..."), which, while informal, enhance the conversational tone without detracting from grammatical integrity.

Paul Mullen's Sentence Example

Selected Sentence:

"Yes, but when the Federal Reserve tells us inflation is cooling or easing, all it is saying is that the rate or speed of price increases is slowing."

Sentence Diagram Explanation:

• Conjunctive Phrase: "Yes, but"

• Dependent Clause: "when the Federal Reserve tells us inflation is cooling or easing"

  • Subordinating Conjunction: "when"
  • Subject: "the Federal Reserve"
  • Verb Phrase: "tells us"
    • Indirect Object: "us"
    • Direct Object: "inflation is cooling or easing"
      • Subject: "inflation"
      • Verb Phrase: "is cooling or easing"

• Main Clause: "all it is saying is that the rate or speed of price increases is slowing."

  • Subject: "all it"
  • Linking Verb: "is saying"
  • Predicate Nominative: "that the rate or speed of price increases is slowing"
    • Dependent Clause: "that the rate or speed of price increases is slowing"
      • Compound Subject: "the rate or speed of price increases"
        • Noun Phrase: "rate or speed"
        • Prepositional Phrase: "of price increases"
      • Verb Phrase: "is slowing"

How It Supports the Analysis:

This sentence showcases the author's use of clear grammar and effective sentence structures to explain a complex economic concept in accessible language. The diagram helps visualize how the dependent clause and main clause are connected, reflecting the conversational tone and logical flow noted in the analysis. By breaking down the sentence, we can see how the author maintains clarity while incorporating multiple ideas.

3. Vocabulary and Diction

The vocabulary is accessible and appropriate for a general audience. The author avoids technical jargon, explaining economic terms in layman's language. Notably, the writer does not use words like "utilize" or "strategize," opting instead for straightforward words like "use" and "plan." This choice contributes to the clarity and readability of the article.

4. Tone and Voice

The tone is informative and cautionary, aiming to educate readers about the realities of inflation and its impact on their finances. The author's voice is authoritative yet relatable, using analogies and real-life examples to make complex economic issues understandable. There's an undercurrent of urgency, encouraging readers to recognize the lasting effects of inflation.

5. Stylistic Devices

• Analogies and Metaphors: Comparing inflation to a burning house to illustrate the lasting damage done to the value of money.
• Rhetorical Questions: Used to provoke thought and engage readers (e.g., "How is this possible? We just heard that inflation was cooling.").
• Quotations: Including Tom Sowell's quote to reinforce the argument about the devaluation of money.
• Repetition: Phrases like "The damage has been done" emphasize the irreversible effects of inflation.

6. Point of View

The article is written in the second person, directly addressing the reader as "you." This perspective creates a personal connection and makes the economic discussion more relatable to individual experiences.

7. Cohesion and Coherence

The piece is cohesive, with each paragraph logically flowing into the next. Transitional phrases and rhetorical questions help maintain coherence, guiding the reader through the argument systematically. The consistent focus on the central theme of inflation's lasting impact ensures the article stays on track.

8. Use of Evidence

The author provides specific data to support claims, such as the 20% increase in prices since January 2021 and federal spending figures. By citing these statistics and referencing economic principles, the article strengthens its credibility and persuasiveness.

9. Estimated Reading Level

The estimated reading level is around grades 9–10. The language is straightforward, and explanations are clear, making it accessible to a broad audience with basic economic understanding.

Summary of Grammar and Writing Analysis

Overall, the article is well-crafted, with clear grammar and effective sentence structures that enhance readability. The use of varied sentence lengths and rhetorical devices like analogies and rhetorical questions keeps the reader engaged and aids in simplifying complex economic concepts. By avoiding overly technical language and not resorting to words like "utilize" or "strategize," the author maintains clarity and approachability.

The conversational tone, achieved through direct address and relatable examples, helps demystify the topic of inflation, making it relevant to the reader's personal experience. The article's organization ensures a logical flow of ideas, building from introducing the misconception about inflation to explaining the underlying issues and concluding with a call to action.

In essence, the writing effectively communicates the lasting impact of inflation on individuals, encouraging readers to recognize and verify the personal relevance of economic policies and trends.

Douglas Wilson

Wilson wrote for his own "Blog & Mablog" website on November 13, 2024. The title of Wilson's post was "How Feminumbulum Got Into Everything."

1. Structure and Organization

The article begins by discussing the nature of deception and how lies can escalate from small personal untruths to large-scale societal deceptions. The author introduces the term "feminumbulum" to encapsulate the cumulative consequences of feminist ideologies since 1848. The piece is organized into several sections with subheadings, such as "First the Tangle," "Evangelical Feminumbulum," "What Nobody Seems to Grasp," and "The Reality Recoil." Each section delves into different aspects of the author's critique of feminism and its impact on society. The article concludes by warning of an impending backlash due to the perceived abuse of natural order.

2. Grammar, Syntax, and Sentence Structure

The writing is grammatically sound, with varied sentence structures that enhance readability. The author employs complex sentences, rhetorical questions, and parenthetical remarks effectively. Punctuation is used correctly, and the flow of ideas is coherent. The syntax supports the argumentative nature of the piece, allowing the author to present nuanced points while maintaining clarity.

Douglas Wilson's Sentence Example

Selected Sentence:

"The truth that these lies are trying desperately to hold off is the fact that women are the domestic sex, and men are not."

Sentence Diagram Explanation:

• Subject: "The truth"

• Relative Clause (modifying 'truth'): "that these lies are trying desperately to hold off"

  • Subject: "these lies"
  • Verb Phrase: "are trying desperately to hold off"
    • Adverb: "desperately"
    • Verb: "are trying to hold off"

• Linking Verb: "is"

• Predicate Nominative: "the fact that women are the domestic sex, and men are not"

  • Noun Phrase: "the fact"

  • Dependent Clause: "that women are the domestic sex, and men are not"

    • First Independent Clause:
      • Subject: "women"
      • Verb Phrase: "are the domestic sex"
        • Predicate Nominative: "the domestic sex"
    • Conjunction: "and"
    • Second Independent Clause:
      • Subject: "men"
      • Verb Phrase: "are not"
        • Predicate Adjective (implied): "domestic"

How It Supports the Analysis:

This sentence reflects the complex sentence structures and advanced vocabulary mentioned in the analysis. The use of a relative clause ("that these lies are trying desperately to hold off") adds depth to the sentence. The diagram illustrates how the sentence layers multiple clauses to convey a nuanced argument, supporting the point that the writing is grammatically sound with intricate syntax that enhances readability.

3. Vocabulary and Diction

The vocabulary is advanced and precise, suitable for an academic or intellectually engaged audience. The author uses specific terms and references, including literary and biblical allusions. While the diction is generally formal, it includes some colloquial expressions and derogatory terms that may be considered offensive. The author avoids overused words like "utilize" or "strategize," opting for more direct language that strengthens the argumentative tone.

4. Tone and Voice

The tone is critical and confrontational, with a strong persuasive voice. The author adopts a didactic approach, aiming to challenge what could be prevailing societal positions regarding feminism and gender roles. The writing conveys a sense of urgency and conviction, reflecting the author's firm stance on the issues discussed. The use of irony and sarcasm underscores the critique and engages the reader on an intellectual level.

5. Stylistic Devices

• Metaphors and Analogies: The author uses metaphors such as assembling furniture incorrectly and nature as an unstoppable force to illustrate the consequences of deviating from traditional gender roles.
• Allusions: References to biblical scripture, historical events like the Seneca Falls Convention, and literary works enrich the text.
• Coined Terms: Introduction of the term "feminumbulum" to encapsulate the author's concept of accumulated feminist consequences.
• Rhetorical Questions: Used to provoke thought and challenge the reader's assumptions.
• Irony and Sarcasm: Employed to emphasize points and critique opposing viewpoints.

6. Point of View

The article is written in the first person plural and singular, utilizing "we" and "I" to involve the reader in the discourse. This perspective allows the author to present arguments intimately and authoritatively, fostering a connection with the reader while advocating for a particular viewpoint.

7. Cohesion and Coherence

The piece maintains cohesion through consistent thematic focus and logical progression of ideas. Subheadings and transitional phrases guide the reader through the arguments. While the content is dense with complex ideas, the organization aids in comprehension. The author's consistent return to the central theme of natural order versus societal changes ensures coherence.

8. Use of Evidence

The author references biblical passages, historical events, and societal observations to support the arguments. Examples like the roles of male and female robins and hypothetical scenarios involving assembling furniture serve as analogies to reinforce points. However, the evidence is largely anecdotal or interpretative, lacking empirical data or citations from scholarly sources.

9. Estimated Reading Level

The estimated reading level is advanced, likely appropriate for college-educated readers or those familiar with theological and philosophical discourse. The complex vocabulary, intricate sentence structures, and depth of concepts require a higher level of literacy and critical thinking skills.

Summary of Grammar and Writing Analysis

From a technical standpoint, the article is well-crafted, demonstrating strong command of grammar and varied syntax that enhances readability. The author's use of advanced vocabulary and precise diction contributes to the articulate expression of complex ideas. Stylistic devices such as metaphors, analogies, and allusions are effectively employed to illustrate arguments and engage the reader.

The excellent use of derogatory terms and a confrontational tone adds significantly the persuasiveness of the piece. The reliance on personal interpretation and lack of empirical evidence may weaken the argument for those seeking objective analysis. The writing is most effective for an audience open to ideological discussions and familiar with the author's perspective.

Overall, the article presents a coherent and strongly voiced critique, marked by sophisticated language and rhetorical skill. It is an excellent piece of writing.